JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 11, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Fabricato S.A

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto la parte resolutiva no ofrece ninguna duda alegada por el accionante
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional respecto de frases o conceptos que ofrezcan verdadero motivo de duda
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia SU.462/20.

El apoderado de Fabricato S.A le solicitó a la Corporación aclarar el fallo de la referencia, por existir dudas frente al requisito de inmediatez de la acción de tutela y los efectos de la providencia de tutela.

La Sala Plena encontró que la petición formulada no contenía argumentos fácticos ni jurídicos que permitieran la aplicación del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso y, por ello, decidió NEGARLA

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia SU-462 de 2020, presentada por el apoderado de Fabricato S.A., por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.